<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DoomBook &#187; Computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doombook.com/category/computer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doombook.com</link>
	<description>Damned Good Literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>RAID-5 Array Not Responding Due to One Dropped Drive</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2009-05-17-raid-5-array-not-responding-due-to-one-dropped-drive.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2009-05-17-raid-5-array-not-responding-due-to-one-dropped-drive.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 16:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linuxrecovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mdadm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAID5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RAID-5 arrays on Linux might not be as dead as they first appear.  Checking out the situation might save some head-to-desk action later on.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2009-05-17-raid-5-array-not-responding-due-to-one-dropped-drive.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KDE4 Revisited, Adding Widgets to the Panel</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2008-02-28-kde4-revisited-adding-widgets-to-the-panel.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2008-02-28-kde4-revisited-adding-widgets-to-the-panel.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KDE4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xorg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2008-02-28-kde4-revisited-adding-widgets-to-the-panel.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that there&#8217;s a new point version and I&#8217;ve had a chance to work KDE4 over properly, I thought it time to revisit it.  As it turns out, putting a widget on the KDE4 panel isn&#8217;t all that hard.
To add a widget to the panel instead of adding it to the desktop, simply click [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2008-02-28-kde4-revisited-adding-widgets-to-the-panel.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updating KDE4, Xorg from Ubuntu to Debian</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2008-02-26-updating-kde4-xorg-on-from-ubuntu-to-debian.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2008-02-26-updating-kde4-xorg-on-from-ubuntu-to-debian.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xorg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2008-02-26-updating-kde4-xorg-on-from-ubuntu-to-debian.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Going with the old apt-get source.list rotation to switch from Ubuntu to Debian.  Since Debian appears to have a working KDE4 repository and a shiny new version of Xorg in their bleeding edge tree I&#8217;m going to give it a whirl.
We&#8217;ll see if the machine is better or worse after an update to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2008-02-26-updating-kde4-xorg-on-from-ubuntu-to-debian.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KDE4 Released, Not Really Ready Already</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2008-01-30-kde4-released-not-really-ready-already.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2008-01-30-kde4-released-not-really-ready-already.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KDE4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xorg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2008-01-30-kde4-released-not-really-ready-already.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been seeing the pictures of KDE4, but haven&#8217;t really had a chance to play with it until now.  But write-ups over at places like Ars have led me to believe it&#8217;s usable, if not stable.
Sitting at a laptop running KDE4 on Ubuntu 7.10 I can assure you this is not the case.
While [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2008-01-30-kde4-released-not-really-ready-already.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acer ASPIRE 4520 Review Forthcoming</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2008-01-22-acer-aspire-4520-review-forthcoming.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2008-01-22-acer-aspire-4520-review-forthcoming.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCBurn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2008-01-22-acer-aspire-4520-review-forthcoming.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve actually had the gumption to write up the first review of the new season.  All it needs are some pretty graphs and analysis of the same and it&#8217;s good to go.
Graphics-wise there is one oddity that&#8217;s throwing up a bit of a sticking point.  Running the OpenGL test &#8220;glxgears&#8221; in a dedicated [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2008-01-22-acer-aspire-4520-review-forthcoming.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s ACER 4520 Laptop Time!</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2007-11-29-its-acer-4520-laptop-time.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2007-11-29-its-acer-4520-laptop-time.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft_tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2007-11-29-its-acer-4520-laptop-time.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems that Shogun and I over on the #PCBurn channel (on irc.freenodel.net) both decided to update the laptops at the same time, and both got ACER 4520s.
His&#8217;ll probably run the stock Vista OS with Ubuntu as a dual boot.  Mine will never see the original OS and I&#8217;ll probably make an inquire to someone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2007-11-29-its-acer-4520-laptop-time.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blizzard Goes and Pulls the Rug out from my Testing</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2007-11-17-blizzard-goes-and-pulls-the-rug-out-from-my-testing.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2007-11-17-blizzard-goes-and-pulls-the-rug-out-from-my-testing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 23:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WINE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2007-11-17-blizzard-goes-and-pulls-the-rug-out-from-my-testing.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;m doing a lot of subjective testing with WoW and  a few different setups, trying to get a feel for how it performs before moving onto another game or two.  All just play through stuff, far too much of the game to actually be fun, really.
And what does Blizzard do halfway through [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2007-11-17-blizzard-goes-and-pulls-the-rug-out-from-my-testing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World of Warcraft as a Benchmark of GPU Performance (on Linux)</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2007-11-15-world-of-warcraft-as-a-benchmark-of-gpu-performance.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2007-11-15-world-of-warcraft-as-a-benchmark-of-gpu-performance.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2007-11-15-world-of-warcraft-as-a-benchmark-of-gpu-performance.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So WINE and WoW do, in fact, make a good benchmark of system performance for Linux.  Unfortunately I&#8217;m now butting up against the fact that it absolutely and sometimes erratically flatlines the system.
It doesn&#8217;t kill the box, but I&#8217;m seeing 100+% CPU usage runs on the dual core.  This creates a slight problem.
So&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2007-11-15-world-of-warcraft-as-a-benchmark-of-gpu-performance.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World of Warcraft on the ATI 200M Notebook GPU</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2007-11-06-world-of-warcraft-on-the-ati-200m-notebook-gpu.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2007-11-06-world-of-warcraft-on-the-ati-200m-notebook-gpu.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2007-11-06-world-of-warcraft-on-the-ati-200m-notebook-gpu.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently I&#8217;m working on a gaming and graphics cards article for PCBurn, and I&#8217;ve finally got the ATI 200M integrated on my Compaq laptop running World of Warcraft.  As it wouldn&#8217;t give me more than blurry squiggels in DirectX 9 and wouldn&#8217;t run in OpenGL previously this is pretty cool.
It&#8217;ll work okay with all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2007-11-06-world-of-warcraft-on-the-ati-200m-notebook-gpu.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Data Recovery Resource</title>
		<link>http://doombook.com/2007-07-13-new-data-recovery-resource.html</link>
		<comments>http://doombook.com/2007-07-13-new-data-recovery-resource.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergeron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linuxrecovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doombook.com/2007-07-13-new-data-recovery-resource.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Dan and I teamed up to put together a site on data recovery for and using Linux.  I&#8217;ve been looking for a steady writing project to go along with PCBurn only with a more commercial bent.  PCBurn isn&#8217;t currently geared toward heavy moneymaking, it&#8217;s geared toward giving me and others a platform [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://doombook.com/2007-07-13-new-data-recovery-resource.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
